<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>International Open Solutions Centre &#187; windows 7</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.iosc.net/blog/tag/windows-7/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.iosc.net/blog</link>
	<description>Share your experience and knowledge computer hardware / software / programming / design / news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 07:34:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Windows 7 Beta, Far Better Than Vista</title>
		<link>http://www.iosc.net/blog/2009/01/12/microsoft-windows-7-beta-far-better-than-vista/</link>
		<comments>http://www.iosc.net/blog/2009/01/12/microsoft-windows-7-beta-far-better-than-vista/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:16:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>boyd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[windows 7]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iosc.net/blog/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://waterblowing.com/2009/01/12/microsoft-windows-7-beta-far-better-than-vista/ Today I just downloaded the Microsoft Windows 7 Beta (2.44GB) which BT at around 1.30MB/s. I tested it under VMWare 5 Workstation Virtual Computer running with 2 CPU (AMD X2 4200), 1 GB RAM and 16GB HDD. The installtion quite fast, it just like installing XP. After the first boot up, I can’t believe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://waterblowing.com/2009/01/12/microsoft-windows-7-beta-far-better-than-vista/">http://waterblowing.com/2009/01/12/microsoft-windows-7-beta-far-better-than-vista/</a></p>
<p>Today I just downloaded the Microsoft Windows 7 Beta (2.44GB) which BT at around 1.30MB/s. I tested it under VMWare 5 Workstation Virtual Computer running with 2 CPU (AMD X2 4200), 1 GB RAM and 16GB HDD. The installtion quite fast, it just like installing XP. After the first boot up, I can’t believe that similar functionality like the stupid Vista BUT the performance is far more better. Please note that this is running in virtual enviroment and ment to be a bit slower than running on real machine. The interface is far impress than the Vista. I bet this time MS doing a real good job, when the full version come up, I definitely will replace my XP with it. The most important part is I can’t wait to test my ATI X4850 with DirectX 10!!!</p>
<p>Good job, MS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.iosc.net/blog/2009/01/12/microsoft-windows-7-beta-far-better-than-vista/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

